Oprah’s Investment in Weight Watchers Was Smart Because the Program Doesn’t Work
Posted: October 14, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health Leave a commentBy Traci Mann
![]()
On October 19, Oprah made news by buying a 10 percent stake in Weight Watchers. Analysts quickly speculated about what the move could mean for Weight Watchers, with the general consensus being that Oprah’s involvement, endorsement, and ability to promote it on her OWN network will be a boon to the company. Sure enough, stock prices more than doubled by the end of the day of the announcement and have stayed up since.
At first glance — and in stark contrast to some of the other wellness ideasshe touts — Winfrey seems to be investing in a scientifically sound weight-loss company. Studies have shown, after all, that Weight Watchers, along with three other popular diets (Zone, Atkins, and South Beach), leads to modest weight loss (an average of about ten pounds) in a year. In fact, those same studies found that only Weight Watchers participants reliably lost more weight than people in control groups who were not enrolled in a diet program at all. At first glance, Weight Watchers works.
But the truth is a bit more complicated: Winfrey’s venture is, in fact, a brilliant investment, although not necessarily for the reason she thinks. It’s brilliant not because Weight Watchers works but because it doesn’t. It’s the perfect business model. People give Weight Watchers the credit when they lose weight. Then they regain the weight and blame themselves. This sets them up to join Weight Watchers all over again, and they do.
The company brags about this to its shareholders. According to Weight Watchers’ business plan from 2001 (which I viewed in hard-copy form at a library), its members have “demonstrated a consistent pattern of repeat enrollment over a number of years,” signing up for an average of four separate program cycles. And in an interview for the documentary The Men Who Made Us Thin, former CFO Richard Samber explained that the reason the business was successful was because the majority of customers regained the weight they lost, or as he put it: “That’s where your business comes from.”
RELATED STORIES
Nice Words Can Lead to Weight LossI Am Training for a Marathon. So Why Am I Getting Fat?
But what about those aforementioned studies showing Weight Watchers works? There’s an important catch: While most dieters do lose weight in the short term, they gain most of it back in the long term. In the one study that followed up with Weight Watchers dieters over a longer-term span, the average dieter had already regained six of the 12 pounds they had lost when researchers checked in two years later. This general pattern is true no matter the diet, and the weight regain only continues in the years that follow. My labreviewed 60 years of clinical trials of diets, and we found that people lose an average of 10 percent of their starting weight on most diets but within two to five years have gained back all but about two pounds.
So, in reality, despite the short-term effectiveness of certain diet regimes, the most common outcome of dieting itself, by a landslide, is either weight regain or trivial weight loss — which leads to a lot of repeat business for companies like Weight Watchers. But no diet, not even Weight Watchers, can claim that more than a small minority of its customers successfully keep the weight off in the long term. To be fair, Weight Watchers doesn’t explicitly promise long-term weight loss, but it neglects to mention that it’s extremely unlikely and instead makes vague claims on its website, such as, “Our proven program works.” Works for what? It would be easy for potential customers to misconstrue the website’s statement that they’ve “helped millions of people change their relationship with food for good.”
The problem is that dieting itself leads to a host of physiological changes that undermine long-term efforts to maintain the weight loss. Some of these changes probably evolved to keep us alive in times of famine. For example, if your body detects that not enough calories are coming in, your metabolism changes so that you can run your body on fewer calories than before, leading your body to store more as fat. So if you eat the same amount of calories that you were eating when you lost weight on your diet, after a while you will stop losing weight, and maybe even start gaining it. Dieters sometimes refer to this as “the plateau,” and it is a predictable result of calorie restriction. Few dieters make it past this plateau.
Dieting also leads to changes in the hormones of the gastrointestinal system, the so-called gut hormones. Some of those hormones (such as leptin and peptide YY) influence when you feel full, and others (including ghrelin) influence when you feel hungry. Levels of leptin and peptide YYdecrease after dieting, whereas levels of ghrelin increase. So food that made you feel full before you dieted will feel less satisfying as your diet goes on, and the extra hunger makes it that much harder to stick to your diet.
To make matters worse, another counterproductive result of dieting is neurological changes that may make food seem even more tempting and even harder to resist than before. Brain-imaging studies by Eric Stice and his colleagues found that, when shown pictures of high-calorie foods, people who had fasted for as few as five hours that day or had lost even two pounds in the last two weeks had increased activation in brain regions associated with liking and craving those foods, paying attention to those foods, and being motivated to acquire and eat them. Stice and his colleagues also found that the longer you deprive yourself, the more appetizing and tougher to resist the foods get. Not surprisingly, these neurological changes have been linked to weight gain.
None of this is to suggest that no one successfully loses weight and keeps it off for several years. But based on surveys of those who do, conducted by Rena Wing at the Brown University’s Alpert Medical School, these folks are not casual dieters. Rather, they tend to make weight loss a singular focus of their life, weighing themselves and everything they eat every day. They tend to eat the same foods in the same amounts most days, and they exercise a ton: a minimum of an hour a day, seven days a week. As obesity expert Kelly Brownell, dean of Duke University’s School of Public Policy, told the New York Times, “They never don’t think about their weight.”
So, despite the inspirational stories of a few outliers, the bottom line is that your goal to keep weight off is at odds with your body’s goal to keep you alive. And your body has the upper hand, making this an unfair fight. When the weight invariably comes back, as it does for all but about 5 percent of dieters, they shouldn’t blame themselves. The problem isn’t the dieter. The problem is dieting itself, as well as the constant temptations in our current food environment. Until people understand this, Weight Watchers will continue to create repeat customers instead of successful dieters, and Oprah will get an impressive return on her investment.
Traci Mann, Ph.D., is a professor of psychology at the University of Minnesota and the author of Secrets From the Eating Lab: The Science of Weight Loss, the Myth of Willpower, and Why You Should Never Diet Again.
How Junk Food Can Damage Your Kidneys as Much as Type 2 Diabetes
Posted: October 14, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health Leave a comment
BY ADAM BIBLE AND BRITTANY SMITH
Seems every month another bit of smart research craps on fast food’s head—and this month is no different. A study in Experimental Physiology has tied fast food to the type of kidney damage seen in folks with type 2 diabetes. Supersize that insurance plan!
In the study, rats were fed either high-fat rodent chow (60% of calories from fat) for 5 weeks or junk food consisting of cheese, chocolate bars, biscuits, and marshmallows for 8 weeks to see how insulin resistance and too much sugar or fat affect the kidneys.
The researchers tested the effect of these diets on blood sugar levels and glucose transporters. They then compared changes seen in their diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance to changes in rats with actual type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
How Much Junk Food Can You Really Get Away With Eating? >>>
Little background info: Type 2 diabetes is typically linked to obesity; in short, your body doesn’t react properly to insulin, or doesn’t produce enough of it, which causes a surplus to accumulate in the blood. This raises blood sugar levels, and certain types of glucose transporters and their regulatory proteins. This can have severe long-term consequences for organs, especially the kidneys.
For type 2 diabetic rats, there was a higher number of glucose transporters (GLUT and SGLT) and regulatory proteins; this was also the case for rats fed a high-fat and junk food diet.
“The Western diet contains more and more processed junk food and fat, and there is a well-established link between excessive consumption of this type of food and recent increases in the prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes,” lead study author Havovi Chichger said in a press release.
These Foods Make CANCER Cells Grow In Your Body! STOP Eating Them Right Now!
Posted: September 29, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health, Non-Toxic Choices Leave a commentFrom A Good Health Blog
It is very important for all of us and for our health in general to have healthy lifestyle, to exercise every day and to eat healthy food, which means plenty of vegetables and fruits and avoid processed and junk food. This is the reason you should be very careful and you should know that the food that you consume can possibly contain carcinogenic compounds and agents, the main cause for this terrible disease. The latest statistics have shown that almost 1.5 million people were diagnosed with cancer only last year. This is why you have to know how to protect yourself and to avoid foods containing cancer-causing compounds. In this article, we will show you a list of 10 foods that we consume each day and they are loaded with carcinogenic compounds.
Here Are The Ten Foods Loaded with Cancer-Causing Agents:
- Soda pop
In a recent study that was published in the American Journal of Nutrition, was discovered that people who drink soda beverages every day are at higher risk of stroke compared to persons who don’t. You should know that the sugar, the coloring and the food chemicals found in the pop sodas release acid into the body that in fact causes cancer. And also, these ingredients are the main reason you’re gaining weight. This means that you should stop dinking soda drinks or at least avoid them as much as you can.
- Refined sugars
You have to avoid refined sugar, since it significantly increases the blood insulin level and this type of sugar is a source of energy and food for the cancer cells. Medical experts claim that high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and fructose-rich sweeteners are a great source of energy for the metabolism and proliferation of cancer cells. The pies, cakes, juices, cookies, cereals, sodas, sauces, etc., contain these sugars that significantly increase the risk for cancer. Because of the high consumption of these foods the cancer rates are raising fast globally.
- Microwave popcorn
Do you know that the bags in which the corns are popped are lined with some chemicals that have been linked to infertility? Well yes, and also you should know that these chemicals have also been connected to lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and liver cancer. And, the worse thing is that many companies use GMO corn kernels, although they don’t want to admit it, which is even more health detrimental.
- Canned tomatoes
The first thing you need to remember is that every type of food that is packed in a can is unhealthy, mostly because of the lining of Bisphenol A on the cans that has been known to contain carcinogens. However, you need to be very careful when you buy canned tomatoes, as canned tomatoes are especially dangerous due to their high acidity level that destroys the lining and causes the chemical to leech inside the tomatoes. Therefore, when you eat canned tomatoes – those chemicals end up in your body. This is why you must always buy fresh tomatoes.
- Foods that are highly salted, pickled or smoked
These foods are really dangerous and bad for our overall health, mostly because of the technique they are produced. The manufactures use nitrates and nitrites to add that salty, smoky flavor that we all love. During this process, these products are being exposed to high amounts of tar, that the smoke produces and we all know that tar is the well-known cancer-causing agent. The products, for example, bologna, bacon, and sausage are extremely high in fat and salt. All of them increase the risk of stomach cancer and colorectal cancer.
- Farmed salmon
Eating fish is very healthy and all nutritionist highly recommended eating fish at least twice a week. However, the truth is that this doesn’t include the farmed fish that apparently everyone is eating. As the latest statistics show, nearly 60% of all fish that Americans consume is farmed fish, and farmed salmon is among the worst types of food we may possibly put on our plates. This kind of fish is bad for our health, as the fish farmers use an assortment of pesticides, chemicals, antibiotics and many other cancer causing agents to make it grow bigger and to be more resistive to diseases. That’s the reason you should avoid farmed salmon, and any other farmed fish and look for a label that confirms that you buy a wild salmon.
- GMOs
Everyone knows that the GMO (Genetically Modified) foods are proven as cancer-causing foods. In light of this, locally grown and organic foods are highly recommended.
- Processed meat
Also you should avoid processed meat, including bacon, hot dogs, sausages and every other processed meat that contain chemical preservatives which make them look as if they are fresh. These products also contain sodium nitrite and sodium nitrate that are connected to cancer, especially the colon cancer.
- Red meat
The most recent study discovered that meat is related and causes colon cancer. The study was conducted by a group of researchers from the US, and it involved about 150 000 people, aged 50-74. It was revealed that long-term use of red meat can increase the risk of colon cancer in the examined subjects. These researchers also found that eating fish and poultry can be beneficial for your general health.
- Potato chips
Besides the fact that potato chips are so high in calories and fat, you also need to know that they contain artificial flavors and colors and additives. The bad thing is that these are all the stuff that the human body doesn’t need. The potato chips are being fried in very high temperatures, and that creates certain harmful substances, which are known as acrylamide, a carcinogen agent that is also found in the cigarettes.
As we said before, you definitely have to avoid these foods, as they can be very bad for you and your health and they are loaded with cancer-causing agents. Try to always eat more fruits and vegetables.
20 Ways to Flavor Your Kombucha
Posted: July 27, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health, In The Kitchen with Millie- How To's, Recipes Leave a comment
It’s been Kombucha week all up on Naturally Loriel lately.
First, we walked through a really easy tutorial on how to make kombucha at home. Then we infused it with elderberries and lavender to create an immune boosting elixir that makes the perfect concoction to be consuming at this time of the year.
And finally, we’re ending this Kombucha party with a roundup of some of the most delicious kombucha recipes around the crunchy web-sphere.
The second ferment or flavoring kombucha happens when you take already brewed kombucha and infuse it with fruits, herbs, or flowers. The fruit can be in chunk form, puree, or as a juice. You let the fruit and the brewed kombucha ferment for a few days, and the result is a fizzy, probiotic-rich drink that has taken on the taste of whatever you’ve chosen to put in the bottle. The amount of sugar (fruit chunks, puree, and/or juice) plays a huge role in how fizzy your second ferment will be. More fruit, more fizz. Less fruit, less fizz. Having quality flip top bottles also helps in the fizzy-ness factor.
Flavoring your own homemade kombucha can take a little bit of trial and error to find that perfect taste but, it’s always fun when you hit the golden flavor that makes you gobble it up in one sitting.
When we’re not flavoring our kombucha with elderberries in the Adams’ household, we love simple concoctions like guava and strawberry, simple “lemonade” kombucha, and berries with lemon.
Below in the printable recipe card, you’ll find a few of my personal favorite recipes and then scroll below to find 15 other ways to flavor your kombucha from some of my favorite crunchy bloggers.
20 Ways to Flavor Your Kombucha
Serves: All of these recipes fill up one 32oz bottle
Ingredients
Guava-Berry Kombucha
- ½ cup guava juice
- 3 strawberries, cut into small pieces (organic, if possible)
Guava Kombucha
- ½ cup guava juice
Blackberry-Lime Kombucha
- 4 blackberries, cut into small pieces
- 1 inch lime (with rind), cut into pieces
Lemonade Kombucha
- 2 inches lemon (with rind), cut into small pieces
Berry-full Kombucha
- 2 strawberries, cut into small pieces (organic, if possible)
- 4 blueberries, smashed (organic, if possible)
- 1 inch lemon (with rind), cut into small pieces
Instructions
- Place your desired ingredients into your flip top bottle
- Pour the first ferment of kombucha; leaving about an inch from the top
- Leave on your counter for 3-7 days; burp once or twice throughout the day to release excess carbonation
- Store in the refrigerator
Researchers document troubling rise in strokes in young adults, starting at age 25
Posted: May 15, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health Leave a commentBy Jennifer Breheny Wallace May 11
From the WashingtonPost
Robin Dickinson and her family. (Adam Houseman)
There’s a troubling statistic in the United States when it comes to strokes. Although stroke hospitalizations have declined in recent years among the aged, the opposite appears to be be happening among younger Americans. In a study released Wednesday in the Journal of the American Heart Association, researchers found that between 2000 and 2010, hospitalizations for ischemic stroke, the most common type, dropped nearly 20 percent overall — but among people ages 25 to 44, there was a sharp 44 percent increase in the rate.
Ischemic stroke accounts for about 80 percent of all strokes and occurs when a blood vessel in the neck or brain is blocked. Deprived of blood’s oxygen and vital nutrients, brain cells begin to die and the abilities controlled by that part of the brain, like muscular control or speech, are compromised.
Doctors attribute the apparent rise in strokes among younger adults to the same lifestyle risk factors traditionally found in older patients, such as obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure. For other young adults, stroke may be caused by rare conditions, like congenital heart defects, or injury to the arteries in the neck, which can be caused by even minor trauma.
[Pop a daily aspirin to help prevent heart attacks, stroke and colon cancer]
“When people think of stroke, they think of Grandpa who smokes and has high blood pressure,” says neurologist Lee Schwamm, director of Massachusetts General Hospital, Acute Stroke Services. “And while he’s more likely to have one, it doesn’t mean that if you’re young and healthy you can’t have a stroke too.”
Roughly 90 percent of the 800,000 strokes each year in the United States happen to adults age 50 and older, but the new study underscores just how significant the risk is for those who are younger.
The data analyzed includes information on 8 million hospital stays and came from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest publicly available database in the United States on these patients. The researcher found that stroke hospitalizations decreased in the two oldest age groups: For those 85 and older, stroke hospitalizations went from 2,077 per 100,000 to 1,618; those ages 65 to 84, the ratio dropped from 846 per 100,000 to 605. But for those ages 45 to 64, the rate rose from 149 per 100,000 to 156; and for those ages 25 to 44, from 16 to 23 per 100,000.
[They said my dad was having a stroke. I wish I had been able to handle it better.]
The researchers said their results should be interpreted with caution because some people fail to recognize that they are having a stroke and don’t seek medical attention, so the number of hospitalizations may be lower than the actual number of people experiencing the condition. Also, among the younger individuals, “we cannot rule out that changes were due to chance since the number of events were small.” However, the researchers added that their findings are consistent with smaller regional studies — such as one in Cincinnati and northern Kentucky — that also showed a similar trend of increasing strokes among younger Americans.
Robin Dickinson’s case serves as a cautionary tale about why even the young should be vigilant about recognizing symptoms of stroke. At age 31, she was married with two young children and working as a family physician near Denver when she unknowingly suffered two strokes within days of each other. The second sent her to the hospital.
“With both strokes, I instantly started spinning and would fall over if I closed my eyes,” she said, “but I dismissed them as migraines.”
While the extreme dizziness gradually got better, she says, it never went away. “Like so many other young adults who have suffered a stroke, I was in denial, even though as a doctor I knew what the symptoms were telling me,” says Dickinson.
[Another reason not to binge-drink: It can give you a heart attack or stroke]
Doctors found the cause of her strokes was due to a tiny tear in a large vessel in her neck that allowed a blood clot to form, break off and limit blood flow to the part of the brain that’s responsible for balance and coordination.
After the strokes, which occurred three years ago, Dickinson said her family’s life was turned upside down. Extreme dizziness, triggered by fatigue, forced her to severely limit her work schedule. “Our finances got so bad that we could only afford to eat potatoes, oatmeal and rice, so we went on food stamps,” she says.
“Three years later,” says Dickinson, “I’m doing better and better, but I still struggle to bring a sense of normalcy back to our family’s lives.”
With a stroke, time-loss is brain-loss — nearly two million brain cells die every minute a stroke goes untreated, increasing the risk of disability or death. Unsuspecting young adults like Dickinson often delay seeking medical attention. But, this delay can cause them to miss the small, critical window when the clot-busting drug tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) may be administered to rescue dying brain cells and stop further damage. Research shows the sooner the drug is given, the better the results — and after four-and-a-half hours, the window for receiving it closes.
“Unfortunately, not all patients qualify for this drug and not every hospital has the staff to administer it 24 hours a day,” says neurologist Salina Waddy, a stroke expert with the National Institutes of Health. “So, the best thing a patient can do is to prevent a stroke in the first place.” Up to 80 percent of strokes are preventable by managing key risk factors, like eating well, exercising, not smoking and limiting alcohol consumption.
Each year significantly more women die from stroke than from breast cancer — and yet many women think of stroke as a man’s disease. According to a 2015 national survey, only 11 percent of the 1000 women surveyed could identify female-specific stroke risk factors, like migraine headaches with aura, hormone-replacement therapy, oral contraception and pregnancy, particularly in the final month and postpartum.
Catherine Zalewski (Zalewski family)
In the summer of 2010, new mom Catherine Zalewski, now 34, was getting ready to feed her 6-month old daughter when she felt a sudden wave of exhaustion accompanied by a tingling of pins-and-needles throughout her body. “I didn’t know what was going on, just that I felt off and my vision was doubled,” says Zalewski. “I remember that I kept missing my daughter’s mouth with the bottle.”
As a former Mrs. New Jersey and a certified personal trainer, Zalewski has always been healthy and in shape, so it never occurred to her that she could be having a stroke. After she managed to put her daughter down in her crib, Zalewski climbed into bed herself for a nap, assuming parental exhaustion was to blame for her symptoms.
Seven hours later, her husband returned home, found her in bed and brought her to the hospital. The stroke left her partially paralyzed. For six weeks, Zalewski underwent in-patient rehabilitation, relearning how to walk, talk and dress herself. “It took me weeks to be able to hold my daughter all by myself,” she says.
In looking for the cause of the stroke, doctors discovered that Zalewski had a patent foramen ovale (PFO), a hole in her heart that required surgery to close. She had the surgery later that year.
With a successful recovery behind her, Zalewski gave birth to a baby boy last year. “Three months later, I was back at the gym training with a client when I suddenly began to feel a numbing sensation,” she says. “My words began to slur, and I quickly realized I was having another stroke — but I couldn’t get the words out.”
Luckily, the manager of her gym noticed the warning signs and called 911. Within an hour she was given the clot-busting drug tPA. Because of the early intervention, her recovery this time was quick. She was back at home and resuming her normal routine within a week.
While doctors still don’t know the cause of her two strokes, Zalewski says she believes it has to do with her pregnancies. “My advice to young mothers is to pay close attention to your own health, too,” says Zalewski. “As women we often take care of everyone else first — let my story be the lesson of the devastating consequences that can come from putting yourself last.”
May is National Stroke Awareness Month. As Catherine Zalewski’s story shows, strokes are highly treatable if you act fast. The American Stroke Association teaches the acronym FAST to help you quickly spot a stroke and take quick action:
- Face drooping. Does one side of the face droop or is it numb? Ask the person to smile. Is the person’s smile uneven?
- Arm weakness. Is one arm weak or numb? Ask the person to raise both arms. Does one arm drift downward?
- Speech difficulty. Is speech slurred? Is the person unable to speak or hard to understand? Ask the person to repeat a simple sentence, like “The sky is blue.” Is the sentence repeated correctly?
- Time to call 911. If someone shows any of these symptoms, even if the symptoms go away, call 911 and get the person to the hospital immediately. Check the time so you’ll know when the first symptoms appeared.
How Gut Bacteria Impacts Obesity, Allergies, Happiness and More
Posted: May 11, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health Leave a comment
From- https://shangshuiw.wordpress.com
A growing body of research has shown that the teeming populations of gut bacteria within us have evolved complex connections that can affect our body’s basic functions — from metabolism to sleep to mood.
Changes in the makeup of the gut bacteria in the human digestive system have been associated with a growing number of diseases.
It’s important to remember, though, that the science is still young and evolving.
Here we highlight the most intriguing of the cutting-edge studies.
Healthy Heart
Some of the many beneficial compounds that certain gut bacteria produce for us are carotenoids—antioxidants that are believed to protect against stroke and angina.
In a 2012 study in Nature Communications, researchers in Sweden compared the gut microbiome of stroke patients to that of healthy subjects and found that there were more carotenoid-producing gut bacteria in healthy participants.
Stanley Hazen, M.D., Ph.D., and his team at the Cleveland Clinic have been looking at a variety of ways microbes play a role in heart disease.
For example, when certain gut bacteria metabolize lecithin (abundant in egg yolks) and carnitine (a compound in red meat), it boosts compounds in the blood that are linked to an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. Remove the bacteria and the risk-causing compounds vanish even after eating those foods.
Allergies Denied
Researchers in Copenhagen reviewed the medical records and stool samples of 411 children for 6 years and found that those who had the least diverse colonies of gut bacteria as infants were more likely to develop some types of allergies.
Trim Weight
A growing body of studies indicates that obese people tend to have a much lower diversity of gut bacteria — up to 40 percent less — than people with a healthy weight. And gut microbes may be responsible for those lean or plump traits: several studies with mice have found that transferring gut microbes from obese mice (or from obese humans) into non-obese mice, leads the non-obese mice to gain weight.
In turn, adding gut bacteria from lean mice into heavy ones causes the chubby mice to lose weight on a high-fiber, low-fat diet. Researchers believe different bacteria metabolize food differently, which could affect how much your body absorbs.
A 2013 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests certain gut microbes may help lower blood pressure.
Researchers found that by-products produced by certain gut bacteria activated a specific kind of cell receptor in blood vessels that lowers blood pressure. More bacteria equals more by-products, which equals healthier blood pressure.
Fight Cancer
A robust and diverse gut microbiome may help certain chemotherapies work better. French researcher Laurence Zitvogel, M.D., Ph.D., and his colleagues observed that gut bacteria in mice encouraged immature immune cells in the lymph nodes to develop into tumor-targeting T-cells.
In contrast, when mice were treated with antibiotics (which wipes out bacteria) before beginning chemotherapy, the chemotherapy was less effective. The researchers believe the gut bacteria help prime the immune system to respond to chemotherapy.
Some microbes may be associated with colon cancer. University of Michigan researchers exposed two groups of germ-free mice — essentially mice with sterile colons — to a known carcinogen.
One group then received gut bacteria from mice with colon cancer and went on to develop twice the number of tumors than the other group who got gut bacteria from cancer-free mice. The researchers narrowed down the microbial families associated with colon cancer and one included Prevotella.
People with inflammatory bowel disease are at higher risk of developing colon cancer than the general population. Researchers have thought that the main culprit is overactive immune cells, which release DNA-damaging molecules.
Now new findings in Science suggest that overactive immune cells also may be causing an imbalance in your gut bacteria — encouraging E. coli strains that produce cancer-causing toxins.
Relaxed & Happy
There’s something to be said for “gut feelings.”
Gut bacteria produce hundreds of different neurotransmitters, including up to 95 percent of the body’s supply of serotonin, a mood and sleep regulator. Serotonin also controls movement within the intestines.
Our gut is said to be our “second brain” in part because the vagus nerve is a major communications highway that stretches from the brain to various points along the intestinal lining; communication travels in both directions.
One Lactobacillus species, for example, sends messages from the small intestine to the brain along this nerve: in a study led by John Cryan, Ph.D., a neuroscientist at University College Cork in Ireland, anxious mice were dosed with a proprietary strain of Lactobacillus rhamnosus.
Those rodents then had lower stress hormone levels and an increase in brain receptors for a neurotransmitter that’s vital in curbing worry, anxiety and fear. The effects were similar to those of Valium.
According to another study, when mice had this bacteria in their gut, they showed less depressive behavior. Whatever bacteria may be responsible for “feeling good,” it appears they can be acquired: a recent experiment moved gut bacteria from fearless mice into anxious mice. The new bacteria sparked a personality change, making timid mice more gregarious
Dan Littman, M.D., Ph.D., a microbiologist at the NYU School of Medicine, led a study that found an association between the gut bacteria Prevotella copri and the onset of rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disease of the joints. While the connection was significant, it’s not clear which comes first: the bacteria or RA.
However, other animal studies, Littman says, have clearly shown that gut microbes play a role in causing autoimmune diseases. One of these, published in 2013 in the journal Science, showed 75 percent of female mice at risk of autoimmune type 1 diabetes were protected against the disease when they were given gut bacteria from healthy mice.
Manage Crohn’s
A large study out of Massachusetts General Hospital involving more than 1,500 patients recently reported a connection between gut microbes and Crohn’s disease (an inflammatory bowel disease that can affect any part of the GI tract, but typically the intestines).
In addition to having less diversity, Crohn’s patients had fewer bacteria known to quell inflammation and more bacteria that cause inflammation.
Interestingly, those who received the standard antibiotic treatment for Crohn’s had a microbe mix that was even more out of balance. Another study found that when Crohn’s patients were given a prebiotic fiber supplement each day, disease symptoms decreased significantly.
Fluoride Officially Classified as a Neurotoxin in World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journal
Posted: April 27, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health, Non-Toxic Choices Leave a comment
From; http://wearechange.org/
There are safe ways to provide fluoride to your teeth if your teeth are deficient. A simple one time gel treatment lasting fifteen minutes is good enough to last a lifetime.
What is hardly safe according to this work is chronic exposure. From the above it is also clearly unnecessary. This is an out of control marketing scheme with dentists providing uninformed testimonials back in the day.
It needs to be shut down and public health needs to test teenagers and young adults for dental floride deficiency although it will likely be already dealt with by dentists. .
.
Fluoride Officially Classified as a Neurotoxin in World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journal
by Nick Meyer
http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.ca/2016/03/fluoride-officially-classified-as.html
The movement to remove industrial sodium fluoride from the world’s water supply has been growing in recent years, with evidence coming out against the additive from several sources.
Now, a report from the world’s oldest and most prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, has officially classified fluoride as a neurotoxin — in the same category as arsenic, lead and mercury.
The news was broken by author Stefan Smyle, who cited a report published in The Lancet Neurology, Volume 13, Issue 3, in the March 2014 edition, by authors Dr. Phillippe Grandjean and Philip J. Landrigan, MD. The report, which was officially released in 2014 and published in the journal, can be viewed by clicking here.
Fluoride Classified Along with Mercury, Lead and Others
As noted in the summary of the report, a systematic review identified five different similar industrial chemicals as developmental neurotoxicants: lead, methylmercury, polychlorinated biphenyls, arsenic, and toluene.
The summary goes on to state that six additional developmental neurotoxicants have also now been identified: manganese, fluoride, chlorpyrifos, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, and the polybrominated diphenyl ethers. The authors added that even more of these neurotoxicants remain undiscovered.
Also in the report, they note that neurodevelopmental disabilities, including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia, and other cognitive impairments, are now affecting millions of children worldwide in what they call a “pandemic of developmental neurotoxicity.”
Because of the documented health risks of fluoride, many people have launched campaigns to remove the chemical from their water supplies, to varying degrees of success. Such initiatives usually begin through the are often controversial and emotionally charged because of the reputation fluoride still enjoys among mainstream dentistry practitioners. In addition to fluoride in city water supplies, the substance can also be found in certain foods, especially in heavily processed brands of tea that may be grown in polluted areas (see this list for more info).
If you’ve ever noticed the warnings on toothpaste labels you probably know just how serious fluoride poisoning can be, especially for children if they swallow too much at one time.
Because of this threat, many parents have begun eschewing fluoridated toothpaste brands altogether and are using more natural brands such as Earthpaste, Dr. Bronner’s toothpaste line, or even making their own from a combination of ingredients such as coconut oil, organic neem leaf powders, essential oils like peppermint or cinnamon, and other natural ingredients.
The fluoride added to our water supply is mostly seen as a cumulative toxin that accumulates in our bodies and can manifest itself in problems over time, including dental fluorosis, or far worse health problems.
Global Fluoride Prevention Strategy Recommended
fluorideIn the Lancet report, the authors propose a global prevention strategy, saying that “untested chemicals should not be presumed to be safe to brain development, and chemicals in existing use and all new chemicals must therefore be tested for developmental neurotoxicity.”
They continue: “To coordinate these efforts and to accelerate translation of science into prevention, we propose the urgent formation of a new international clearinghouse.”
The report coincides with 2013 findings by a Harvard University meta-analysis funded by the National Institutes of Health that concluded that children in areas with highly fluoridated water have “significantly lower” IQ scores that those who live in areas with low amounts of fluoride in their water supplies.
Sodium fluoride in drinking water has also been linked to various cancers. It is functionally different than the naturally-occurring calcium fluoride, and commonly added to drinking water supplies and used by dentists who posit that it is useful for dental health.
Fluoridation is Actually Uncommon in Europe
Currently, fluoride is added to water supplies across much of North America, but as this list of countries that ban or reject water fluoridation shows, the practice is actually not too common, or banned entirely throughout most of Europe and in several other developed nations across the world.Fluoride Filter
Since most places in America still add fluoride to the water a high quality water filter is recommend to filter out the fluoride, and it can be especially important to avoid exposing yourself to too much fluoride in your daily shower or bath.
What is the Difference Between Natural Fluoride and the Kind That is Artificially Added to Our Water Supply?
On the heels of recent news that the fluoride in North American drinking water supplies is considered to be a neurotoxin according to a recent study in the top peer-review medical journal The Lancet, on par with some of the most notorious environmental toxins out there, many people are becoming more interested in the truth about fluoride.
Specifically, most people still do not know the difference between the naturally occurring calcium fluoride and other industrialized forms that are added to water supplies in North America (but not throughout most of Europe, and many other high-tech countries).
That’s because the term “fluoride” is often thrown around without making a distinction between these substances.
There are three types of fluoride used to “fluoridate” water supplies: Fluorosilicic acid, sodium fluorosilicate and sodium fluoride.
Fluorosilicic acid is the type most often used for cost reasons, and it is derived from phosphate fertilizers according to the CDC’s website.
The other two are created by adding either table salt or caustic soda to the mix.
Fluoride Corrodes Town’s Pipes
These types of fluoride can be quite corrosive, as one town found out the hard way when the fluoride they used to add to their water supply began corroding pipes and damaging city vehicles. Officials from the town, Buffalo, Missouri, voted to stop fluoridating the water supply recently due to these issues.
In contrast with these types of fluoride is calcium fluoride, which is a much safer version of fluoride.
Calcium fluoride is considered the “least toxic” and in some cases “relatively harmless”according to the site fluoridedetective.com, and that’s because of its high insolubility.
Magnesium and especially calcium are known as minerals that counteract the effects of fluoride, an example of how nature often pairs antidotes with poisons or designs complete foods that mitigate harmful substances for the most part.
This type of fluoride is often found in natural waters, while the above industrial byproducts are added to water supplies, a highly controversial practice that more and more people are asking to be changed.
Many Towns are Being Pressured to Remove Flouride
While it was originally added as a way to assist in the area of dental health, more and more people are questioning whether that is actually true and many towns are removing fluoride due to grassroots citizens’ movements.
(A list of towns that have removed fluoride since 2014 can be viewed here).
And considering the health risks involved, not to mention the safety concerns and costs, many cities and towns will have a decision to make in the coming years about whether or not to stop fluoridation.
Diet Soda’s Aspartame Associated with Cardiovascular Issues, Brain Tumors, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Kidney Function Decrease
Posted: April 17, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health, Non-Toxic Choices Leave a commentAre you still thirsty? Or just addicted to this toxic chemical? Well, here’s another reason why you ought to refuse to pour this poison cocktail down your esophagus.
According to an article in Collective Evolution, researchers at the University of Iowa have been taking another look at aspartame, although I really don’t know why they need any more proof of it’s toxicity. It was kept off the market until 1981, thanks to the consumer advocate and lawyerJames Turner.
60,000 women took part in the research and here’s what they found:
“… Women who consumed two or more diet drinks a day are 30 percent more likely to experience a cardiovascular event, and 50 percent more likely to die from a related disease.”
Of course the folks who created this study have merely called for more research:
“‘It’s too soon to tell people to change their behavior based on this study; however, based on these and other findings we have a responsibility to do more research to see what is going on and further define the relationship, if one truly exists,’ says Dr. Ankur Vyas, because ‘This could have major public health implications.’”
Hmmm. The major health implication of these neurotoxins were pointed out over four decades ago. Since it was ole Donald Rumsfeld who commandeered this poison into the food supply, a quote from the liar himself might be appropriate.
That aspartame is a toxic poison is what Donald would call a “known known”, don’t you think?
(Photo credit: Deesillustration.com)
Vitamin D Heals Damaged Hearts
Posted: April 14, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health Leave a comment
Vitamin D supplements may help people with diseased hearts, a study suggests.
A trial on 163 heart failure patients found supplements of the vitamin, which is made in the skin when exposed to sunlight, improved their hearts’ ability to pump blood around the body.
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals team, who presented at a meeting of the American College of Cardiology, described the results as “stunning”.
The British Heart Foundation called for longer trials to assess the pills.
Vitamin D is vital for healthy bones and teeth and may have important health benefits throughout the body but many people are deficient.
No safe way to suntan – warning
The average age of people in the study was 70 and, like many people that age, they had low levels of vitamin D even in summer.
“They do spend less time outside, but the skin’s ability to manufacture vitamin D also gets less effective [with age] and we don’t really understand why that is,” said consultant cardiologist Dr Klaus Witte.
Patients were given either a 100 microgram vitamin D tablet or a sugar pill placebo each day for a year.
And researchers measured the impact on heart failure – a condition in which the heart becomes too weak to pump blood properly.
The key measure was the ejection fraction, the amount of blood pumped out of the chambers of the heart with each beat.
In a healthy adult, the figure is between 60% and 70%, but only a quarter of the blood in the heart was being successfully pumped out in the heart failure patients.
But in those taking the vitamin pills, the ejection fraction increased from 26% to 34%.
Dr Witte told the BBC News website: “It’s quite a big deal, that’s as big as you’d expect from other more expensive treatments that we use, it’s a stunning effect.
“It’s as cheap as chips, has no side effects and a stunning improvement on people already on optimal medical therapy, it is the first time anyone has shown something like this in the last 15 years.”
The study also showed the patients’ hearts became smaller – a suggestion they are becoming more powerful and efficient.
In the UK, people over 65 are advised to take 10 microgram supplements of the vitamin.
However, Dr Witte does not think high-dose vitamin D should be routine prescribed just yet.
He told the BBC: “We’re a little bit off that yet, not because I don’t believe it, but data have shown improvements in heart function, they may show improvements in symptoms and we now need a large study.”
It is also not clear exactly how vitamin D is improving heart function, but it is thought every cell in the body responds to the vitamin.
Most vitamin D comes from sunlight, although it is also found in oily fish, eggs and is added to some foods such as breakfast cereals.
Prof Peter Weissberg, from the British Heart Foundation, cautioned that the patients seemed no better at exercise.
And added: “A much bigger study over a longer period of time is now needed to determine whether these changes in cardiac function can translate into fewer symptoms and longer lives for heart failure patients.”
Don’t Feed Babies a Ton of Rice Cereal, Says FDA
Posted: April 14, 2016 Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health Leave a comment
Millie- say don’t feed them ANY grains at all, especially the first year!
Rice cereal is a popular first food for babies. It’s also kind of high in arsenic, says the Food and Drug Administration, so if your kid gets a steady rice cereal diet, it’s time to diversify.
Plants pick up minerals from the soil they’re grown in. Rice is especially good at picking up arsenic. It doesn’t matter if the rice was grown organically or not; this is a blanket warning for rice in general. Baby rice cereal is getting the most attention because some babies eat a lot of it. It’s typically fortified with iron and other nutrients, so pediatricians love to recommend it. The FDA says it’s still fine in small quantities, but don’t go crazy:
Rice cereal fortified with iron is a good source of nutrients for your baby, but it shouldn’t be the only source, and does not need to be the first source. Other fortified infant cereals include oat, barley and multigrain.
Pregnant women, likewise, should avoid relying heavily on rice in their diet. At very high levels, arsenic can interfere with a baby’s brain development. Brown rice carries more arsenic than white rice, and some rice-growing parts of the world have more arsenic than others, Deborah Blum writes at Undark. Arsenic has also been found at high levels in organic brown rice syrup, which is used as a sweetener.
Currently, the FDA does not set a limit on the amount of arsenic that can be in rice products. In a recent analysis, they sampled infant rice cereals and other foods. About half (53%) had levels above the European Union’s cutoff of 100 parts per billion. Non-rice foods were all below that level. The report doesn’t name brands, but baby food maker Gerber quickly wrote a letter to families pointing out that their rice cereals were all below 100 ppb.
The FDA has more information on arsenic in rice here.You can read their recent warning to parents at the link below.
For Consumers: Seven Things Pregnant Women and Parents Need to Know About Arsenic in Rice and Rice Cereal | FDA via Undark



